Afghanistan and the West

The other day, I saw a blurry smart-phone video made by a man who was clinging to the side of a military airplane as it took off. I don’t know the fate of the man, but it’s likely that he fell from the sky and died shortly afterward. He was seeking a better life in the West, but he ended his life as a meat pancake in his homeland. He had a marvel of modern technology in his hand, the smart-phone, which gave him access to a vast store of knowledge. He could have just googled “Can you hang onto a plane?”. But I guess that didn’t occur to him.

Afghans cling to moving US Air Force jet in desperate bid to flee

Most people interpret current events through a moral narrative. The left will try to blame Trump for the US failure in Afghanistan, or perhaps George W. Bush. The right will blame Biden, or point to the long escalation under Obama. Reactionaries will talk about the futility of nation building, and maybe even cheer the Taliban as fellow enemies of the neoliberal global order.

Rather than viewing current events through a moral narrative, I try to understand them as part of bigger historical processes. For that reason, I focus on aspects of the event that others ignore, such as population growth.

The population of Afghanistan roughly doubled from the beginning of the US invasion in 2001 to the withdrawal in 2021. The fertility rate in Afghanistan was very high at the beginning of that period. It is somewhat lower now, but still well above replacement.

Fertility is not uniform.

Almost everyone in Afghanistan is a fundamentalist Muslim by Western standards. The overwhelming majority want a society based on Sharia (Islamic law), according to a Pew Research study. However, some are more traditional and some are more modern, in terms of beliefs and behavior. The more traditional have higher fertility, so they are out-breeding the more modern.

Modern fashions spread by communication, through mass media and social media. Traditional values propagate by reproduction, from parents to children. They increase by fertility.

Afghanistan is on the leading edge of a biological reaction against modernity. Modern civilization allows almost all children to live to adulthood. Somewhat ironically, this makes a traditional way of life more adaptive, because high fertility is the best reproductive strategy when child mortality is low. The most “backward” people, such as fundamentalist Muslims and the Amish, are the most adapted to modernity, because they are ideologically opposed to it. They benefit from modern civilization, while rejecting it.

The future belongs to those who show up and fight for it. Afghanistan is full of young men, many of whom were born since the US invasion of 2001. They are willing to fight for the future. That is why the United States failed in Afghanistan.

The neocons were Western imperialists, in a way. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, they believed that the modern liberal state was the end of history: that it was destined to eventually replace all existing political systems. They believed that oppressive regimes (such as the Taliban) were standing in the way of progress, and if they used military force to crush those regimes, modern liberal societies would arise, with a little help from the West.

Of course, the neocons expected to enrich themselves and their friends in the process. I don’t want to attribute altruistic motives to them. But they did have a moral narrative, which they used to justify their military adventures and social experiments. They really believed in that narrative, as much as the Taliban really believe in Islam.

Their moral narrative made them blind to certain things. They did not understand the importance of demographics in determining the future. They did not understand the weakness of the modern liberal system: that it is actively engaged in pulling the demographic rug out from under its own feet. They did not understand the strength of fundamentalism in the modern environment. So, they failed.

Ignorance of reality often leads to catastrophic failure.

The neocon worldview has been brutally falsified by the failure of Western interventions to produce modern liberal societies. It has also been falsified by the failure of immigrants to assimilate to Western societies, and by growing problems within modern civilization, such as the collapse of fertility and the breakdown of the family.

The withdrawal from Afghanistan is not significant for military or economic reasons. It is significant for cultural reasons. Afghanistan shows that modern liberalism is not the end of history, but is a historical dead end. It shows that moral progress (defined by modern Western standards of morality) is not the driving force of history. It shows that the West, in spite of its military superiority, is weak in many ways.

Most people in the West are blissfully ignorant of those things. Like the man clinging to the airplane, they are looking forward to a better future.

Comments

  1. “The more traditional are out-breeding the more modern, and have been for a long time. That is one of the reasons for the rise of fundamentalism in the Muslim world over the last 50 years.”

    That doesn't make much sense when you consider that conservatives in the West must have experienced the same advantage – indeed, given the most liberal environment in the world, the greatest comparative advantage – yet the West has steadily drifted leftwards and continues to do so even at the conservative margin: https://n.c7.ee/davidshor/status/1432359602193059847#m

    For anecdotal evidence, even Mormons are shifting leftwards over time: https://www.washingtonpost.com/magazine/2021/09/27/rise-liberal-latter-day-saints/

    I think you make the mistake of trying to reduce complex social phenomena down to a single factor, much as what we see with campus radicals' obsession with intersectional power dynamics. It's more likely that religion has simply been instrumentalized in those regions for rather more earthly reasons, just as what we see happening with the regressive left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. American conservatives have a fertility rate that is barely above replacement. It's nowhere near the fertility rate of Afghanistan over the last few decades. In the West, the Christian conservative fertility advantage over atheists and leftists is not big enough to make up for the impact of mass immigration. Christianity does not promote a high fertility way of life. Mormonism used to, but not so much today.

      I'm not reducing complex social phenomena to a single factor. Fertility is a very important factor in determining the future, but it's not the only factor. Maybe you're trying to deny the importance of fertility.

      Delete

Post a Comment